TY - JOUR
T1 - Curriculum Placement, Race, Class and Gender Differences in Wage Growth Amongst Non-College Workers: Evidence from the NELS 1988—2000 Data
AU - Sakura-Lemessy, Ian
AU - Carter-Tellison, Katrina
AU - Sakura-Lemessy, Donna-May
PY - 2009/12/27
Y1 - 2009/12/27
N2 - This study assessed competing predictions from neoclassical human capital and social reproduction theories regarding the role of students' gender, class and racial status in determining high school curriculum placement, early post secondary job destination and wage attainment. Our findings support predictions from reproductive theories in that they revealed significant class, race and gender disparities in students' educational and employment outcomes, even after accounting for workers prior achievement. These findings have important implications for two fields of research: education and labor market inequality, especially within the context of the education literature where institutional processes are often assumed to be neutral. Moreover, our results highlighted the mechanisms underpinning high school curriculum tracking that discriminate against race, class and gender subgroups. We conclude with a discussion on policy recommendations and suggestions for future research. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009.
AB - This study assessed competing predictions from neoclassical human capital and social reproduction theories regarding the role of students' gender, class and racial status in determining high school curriculum placement, early post secondary job destination and wage attainment. Our findings support predictions from reproductive theories in that they revealed significant class, race and gender disparities in students' educational and employment outcomes, even after accounting for workers prior achievement. These findings have important implications for two fields of research: education and labor market inequality, especially within the context of the education literature where institutional processes are often assumed to be neutral. Moreover, our results highlighted the mechanisms underpinning high school curriculum tracking that discriminate against race, class and gender subgroups. We conclude with a discussion on policy recommendations and suggestions for future research. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009.
KW - Curriculum placement
KW - Education and labor market inequality
KW - Gender inequality
KW - Race and ethnic studies
KW - Vocational education
KW - Wage inequality
UR - https://lynn-lang.student.lynn.edu:2165/linkprocessor/plink?id=467bf85f-ce97-31cf-b5b5-6958036ae44d
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350740997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350740997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2dada135-5fa1-3838-ad71-37ec6d690db5/
U2 - 10.1007/s12111-009-9093-6
DO - 10.1007/s12111-009-9093-6
M3 - Article
SN - 1559-1646
VL - 13
SP - 406
EP - 430
JO - Journal of African American Studies
JF - Journal of African American Studies
IS - 4
ER -