Abstract
This study assessed competing predictions from neoclassical human capital and social reproduction theories regarding the role of students' gender, class and racial status in determining high school curriculum placement, early post secondary job destination and wage attainment. Our findings support predictions from reproductive theories in that they revealed significant class, race and gender disparities in students' educational and employment outcomes, even after accounting for workers prior achievement. These findings have important implications for two fields of research: education and labor market inequality, especially within the context of the education literature where institutional processes are often assumed to be neutral. Moreover, our results highlighted the mechanisms underpinning high school curriculum tracking that discriminate against race, class and gender subgroups. We conclude with a discussion on policy recommendations and suggestions for future research. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 406-430 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of African American Studies |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 27 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Gender Studies
- Cultural Studies
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Curriculum placement
- Education and labor market inequality
- Gender inequality
- Race and ethnic studies
- Vocational education
- Wage inequality
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver