Abstract
A recent article by Richard Wollert (2007) purports to demonstrate that the diagnostic inter-rater reliability of sex offender civil commitment evaluations is not high enough to be worthy for courtroom testimony. That author relies on a series of analyses to support that argument. Unfortunately, those analyses were flawed in serious ways, raising doubt about the overall conclusions drawn. This article delineates Wollert's inaccurate assumptions, addresses methodological flaws, and offers an alternative interpretation regarding the accuracy of sexual offender civil commitment assessments.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Sex Offender Treatment |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - May 2009 |