Failure to Register as a Sex Offender: Is it Associated with Recidivism?

  • Jill S. Levenson*
  • , Elizabeth J. Letourneau
  • , Kevin S. Armstrong
  • , Kristen M. Zgoba
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between failure to register (FTR) as a sex offender and subsequent recidivism (N = 2,970). No significant differences were found between the sexual recidivism rates of those who failed to register and compliant registrants (11% vs. 9%, respectively). There was no significant difference in the proportion of sexual recidivists and nonrecidivists with registration violations (12% vs. 10%, respectively). FTR did not predict sexual recidivism, and survival analyses revealed no significant difference in time to recidivism when comparing those who failed to register (2.9 years) with compliant registrants (2.8 years). Results fail to support the supposition that sexual offenders who fail to register are more sexually dangerous than those who comply with registration requirements. The punitive emphasis on registration enforcement may not be justified and might divert limited resources away from strategies that would better facilitate public protection from sexual violence. © 2010 Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)305-331
Number of pages27
JournalJustice Quarterly
Volume27
Issue number3
Early online dateJun 17 2010
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Keywords

  • Failure to register
  • Recidivism
  • Registration
  • Sex crime policy
  • Sex offender

Cite this