Objective List Theories and Ill-Being

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

What, if anything, directly detracts from well-being? Objective list theorists affirm basic goods such as knowledge, friendship, and achievement, but it is less clear what they should say about opposing bads. In this paper, I argue that false beliefs, unhealthy relationships, and failed projects are not basic bads and do not directly detract from well-being. They can have bad effects or elements, or block the realization of basic goods, but do not themselves carry negative weight with respect to well-being. This is shown by comparing cases where these bads are present and absent, examining their relation to negative overall well-being, and considering the role of these bads in the pursuit of positive goods.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)1073-1085
Number of pages13
JournalEthical Theory and Moral Practice
Volume22
Issue number5
Early online dateOct 24 2019
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature B.V.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Keywords

  • Achievement
  • Friendship
  • Ill-being
  • Knowledge
  • Objective list theory
  • Well-being

Cite this